<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What would you do with $700 billion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevebridger.com/2008/09/700-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevebridger.com/2008/09/700-billion/</link>
	<description>Builder of Bridges</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerhard Buttner</title>
		<link>http://www.stevebridger.com/2008/09/700-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerhard Buttner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevebridger.com/?p=35#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Interesting comparison (and thanks for that oxfam link): obviously too simplistic as you point out, Steve, but it surely shows something is a bit rotten. It reminds me of how quickly Cancun and the Riviera Maya &quot;recovered&quot; after Wilma with a lot of help to rebuild the tourism industry - especially luxury hotels, yet many of the poorest who lost everything of the little they had - which would be immensely much cheaper too replace - are still waiting.
 
One complication: any fairer redistribution work needs to be administrated (VERY NECESSARY - and distributing to millions is much harder work than distributing to a few banks!), and the administrators want to be paid, and want to be paid well, and others want their share of the pie to &quot;smooth the way&quot; (SHOULDN´T BE NECESSARY, BUT A REALITY IN MANY PLACES, that would need to be worked on first - costing even more etc. etc. and those Structural adjustment plans had very harsh yet actually superficial theoretical ways of wanting to solve this - and never did)
 
And unfortunately $1.50 a day is also still poverty even in the poorest nations.
http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/pressoffice/?p=1775
has more examples of how much $700 billion is in a poverty context. 

But the bottom-line: Cracks are showing everywhere in our increasingly unsustainable economic and environmental global order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comparison (and thanks for that oxfam link): obviously too simplistic as you point out, Steve, but it surely shows something is a bit rotten. It reminds me of how quickly Cancun and the Riviera Maya &#8220;recovered&#8221; after Wilma with a lot of help to rebuild the tourism industry &#8211; especially luxury hotels, yet many of the poorest who lost everything of the little they had &#8211; which would be immensely much cheaper too replace &#8211; are still waiting.</p>
<p>One complication: any fairer redistribution work needs to be administrated (VERY NECESSARY &#8211; and distributing to millions is much harder work than distributing to a few banks!), and the administrators want to be paid, and want to be paid well, and others want their share of the pie to &#8220;smooth the way&#8221; (SHOULDN´T BE NECESSARY, BUT A REALITY IN MANY PLACES, that would need to be worked on first &#8211; costing even more etc. etc. and those Structural adjustment plans had very harsh yet actually superficial theoretical ways of wanting to solve this &#8211; and never did)</p>
<p>And unfortunately $1.50 a day is also still poverty even in the poorest nations.<br />
<a href="http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/pressoffice/?p=1775" rel="nofollow">http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/pressoffice/?p=1775</a><br />
has more examples of how much $700 billion is in a poverty context. </p>
<p>But the bottom-line: Cracks are showing everywhere in our increasingly unsustainable economic and environmental global order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Booth</title>
		<link>http://www.stevebridger.com/2008/09/700-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevebridger.com/?p=35#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Our banking system has behaved like it is teenage, with someone there to bail it out. We have confirmed that belief - and that&#039;s my biggest problem here.

Poverty has many causes. One thing that helps people rise out of poverty is a reliable way of storing and exchanging the value built up through effort and knowledge.  That&#039;s otherwise known as a reliable banking system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our banking system has behaved like it is teenage, with someone there to bail it out. We have confirmed that belief &#8211; and that&#8217;s my biggest problem here.</p>
<p>Poverty has many causes. One thing that helps people rise out of poverty is a reliable way of storing and exchanging the value built up through effort and knowledge.  That&#8217;s otherwise known as a reliable banking system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

